| |
Brief Executive Summary for an Opportunity to Change the World
|
|
|
In the context of any hard science and technology, there is no exception to this rule: Any dominant paradigm can be subverted if it is rooted in flawed belief (or system of interdependent beliefs). A paradigm is said to be rooted in a belief (or system of beliefs), if large chunks of the BoK (Body of Knowledge) for the paradigm is acquired and accumulated by relying on the belief (e.g. if the belief is one of the main foundation or first principle) for long enough time for the paradigm to become dominant paradigm. |
|
|
For example, geocentric paradigm was subverted in 16th century, because it was rooted in 2300-year-old flawed belief that “the Earth is static at the centre”. The geocentric paradigm became dominant paradigm (by 16th century) by acquiring and accumulating BoK for 1800 years (between 300BC and until 16th century) by relying on the flawed belief (i.e. the Earth is static). Only flawed paradigms can be subverted. No paradigm can be subverted, if it is not rooted in flawed beliefs. It is impossible to subvert dominant paradigms such as heliocentric paradigm, because there is no chance for the first principle “the Sun is at the centre” at the root is flawed. |
|
|
Any paradigm including heliocentric paradigm can be and will be subverted, if & only if it is rooted in flawed beliefs. There is no exception to this rule: Any flawed dominant paradigm in any scientific or technological discipline must be subverted, if it is rooted in flawed beliefs, because there is no other way for advancing the discipline without subverting such flawed dominant paradigm. There is no other way for making any tangible progress in the discipline, except subverting such flawed paradigm.
|
|
|
Mankind still would be in the dark ages, if the flawed beliefs or lies at the root of the geocentric paradigm were not yet exposed. All the great scientists born during past 400 years (e.g. Newton, Einstein, Bose, Max Planck, Bohr, Pauli, Dirac or Maxwell) could not have made any tangible contribution, except may be exposing the error at the root of geocentric paradigm. Each of them must had wasted their hard work and passion in pursuit of fool’s errand (e.g. to make sense of incomprehensible and/or inexplicable epicycles or retrograde motion of geocentric model). |
|
|
|
Existing dominant software engineering paradigm can’t be an exception to this rule (even if it is impossible to believe): If it is rooted in flawed beliefs (or an ecosystem of interdependent beliefs), it can be and must be subverted. No meaningful progress is possible until such flawed paradigm is subverted by exposing the flawed beliefs that are very foundation of the BoK for the dominant paradigm. It is certainly possible to subvert any dominant paradigm rooted in flawed beliefs (without any exception), but at what cost and effort? Does the risks, costs and efforts worth potential gains? |
|
|
|
What are the potential gains in comparison to costs and pains or risks? Can we quantify the size of the gains, in best-case scenario and worst-case scenario? Can we quantify the size of the costs, in best-case scenario and worst-case scenario? How do they stack up with each other? Any such belief or first principle at the root is a lie, if it successfully prevents scientists and researchers form seeing otherwise obvious reality or facts by fundamentally altering their perception reality. |
|
|
Therefore, the flawed belief that “the Earth is static” must be treated as a lie, because it fundamentally altered mankind’s perception of reality by creating flawed geocentric paradox. Any flawed beliefs at the root of existing dominant software engineering paradox can’t be an exception to this rule. All we need to prove is that exiting dominant software engineering paradigm is rooted in flawed beliefs or lies. |
|
|
If the beliefs (or ecosystem of interdependent beliefs) at the root of existing dominate software paradigm are flawed, such dominant paradigm can be and must be subverted. Pioneer-soft has accumulated for past 16 years overwhelming evidence and facts to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the beliefs (or ecosystem of interdependent beliefs) are fundamentally flawed. Such untested unproven flawed beliefs (or ecosystem of interdependent beliefs) must be treated as lies, because they have been successfully preventing researchers and scientists from seeing obvious facts and reality by fundamentally altering our perception of reality. |
|
|
There is no exception to this rule for software: Subverting any flawed dominant paradigm leads to a revolution and unprecedented technological progress. If anyone wants to change the world, here is an opportunity by joining me: The market size of worldwide software development and maintenance is estimated at US$1.2 trillion/year. |
| |
|
| |
Copy Right © 2013 SPPS Systems Pvt.Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
This Website presents patented and patent-pending Inventions and Discoveries |
|
|
